| Dept. of Corrections - Proposed Rules |
|
|
 |
|
|
This page contains information about proposed rulemaking by the Oregon Department of Corrections. This includes rule changes that are under consideration, but not yet adopted. All agency rulemaking notices are published by the Secretary of State in the Oregon Bulletin.
Comments
Public input is very important to the rulemaking process. The department welcomes comments on proposed rules. When submitting comments, please be sure to include the division number and title of the proposed rule.
Mailing Address:
Rules Office
Department of Corrections
2575 Center Street
Salem, OR 97301-4667
Contact:
Birdie.Worley@doc.state.or.us
PDF Files
ODOC provides documents in .pdf format. In order to view PDF files, you must have Acrobat Reader on your computer. Click here to downloan free Adobe Acrobat Reader.
|
|
|
Interstate Compact - Retaken Offenders
This rulemaking is necessary in order for the Department of Corrections to require that an offender who was previously retaken and returned to this state from another state at cost to the State of Oregon, whether by formal or informal means, repay those costs to the State of Oregon before the offender may be approved by the Department for an interstate compact supervision transfer. Limited exceptions may be granted by the Compact Administrator or designee based on individual circumstances.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Statement of Need
Text
|
|
|
Evidence-Based Programs in Community Corrections
These rules establish a process for the department to determine if community-based programs, which the agency expends state funds, meet the principles of evidence-based programs.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Statement of Need
Text
|
|
|
Suspension/Restriction of Visit/Removal From Inmate Visiting List
These amendments are necessary for the department to establish a flexible, extended timeframe for a superintendent or designee to issue a final order on review of a recommended action to suspend, restrict, or remove a visitor from an inmate’s approved visiting list beyond 45 days when the circumstances giving rise to the suspension, restriction, or removal action are part of a pending administrative or criminal investigation, or in other extraordinary circumstances, which in the sole judgment of the superintendent or designee requires or warrants additional time.
These amendments are also needed to clarify in the rule that if a visitor does not timely submit a written review request, the recommended action contained in the notification and written report shall be accepted by the superintendent/designee and serve as the superintendent’s/designee’s decision without further action.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Statement of Need
Text
|
|
|
|
