Text Size:   A+ A- A   •   Text Only
Find     
Site Image

1990 Final Opinions
January
 
88-082 KIRPAL LIGHT SATSANG v DOUGLAS COUNTY
 
88-130 SUNBURST II HOMEOWNERS v CITY OF WEST LINN
 
89-024 PERUZZO v WASCO COUNTY
 
89-067 REYNOLDS METALS CO. v CITY OF TROUTDALE
 
89-086 DOUGLAS v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
 
89-096 BECK v CITY OF TILLAMOOK
 
89-106 O'BRIEN v CITY OF WEST LINN
 
89-119 WEIST v JACKSON COUNTY
 
89-124 FLOWERS v KLAMATH COUNTY
 
89-136 OREGON ASPHALTIC PAVING CO. v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-145 PENDLETON RENTAL OWNERS v CITY OF PENDLETON
 
89-150 OAK LODGE WATER DISTRICT v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
 

February
 
83-083 McDONALD v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
88-110 DYKE v CLATSOP COUNTY
 
89-025 KIRPAL LIGHT SATSANG v DOUGLAS COUNTY
 
89-077 WALKER v CITY OF BEAVERTON
 
89-105 & 111 FOLAND v JACKSON COUNTY
 
89-110 GANNAWAY v UMATILLA COUNTY
 
89-118 STEFAN v YAMHILL COUNTY
 
89-131 GARRE v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-132 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v LANE COUNTY
 
89-133 DLCD v JOSEPHINE COUNTY
 
89-135 & 142 SPARACINO v KLAMATH COUNTY
 
89-141 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v COOS COUNTY
 
90-001 ELLIOTT v LANE COUNTY
 
90-003 LeROQUE v CITY OF GRESHAM
 
90-010 GLEANERS OF CLACKAMAS CO. v CLACKAMAS COUNTY

March
 
89-005 ECKIS v LINN COUNTY
 
89-018 CORBETT/TERWILLIGER NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
89-134 ZORN v MARION COUNTY
 
89-146 ATKINS v DESCHUTES COUNTY
 
89-147 J.K. LAND CORPORATION v CITY OF GRESHAM
 
89-152 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
 
89-155 THENNES v DOUGLAS COUNTY
 
90-014 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v DOUGLAS COUNTY
 
90-043 ELLIOTT v CITY OF EUGENE
 

April
 
89-035 OREGON AAA v METRO
 
89-112 VESTIBULAR DISORDER CONSULT. v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
89-144 HEADLEY v JACKSON COUNTY
 
89-151 NELSON v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-158 SCHATZ v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
 
90-002 NICOLAI v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-007 DLCD v COLUMBIA COUNTY
 
90-008 BLOOMER v BAKER COUNTY
 
90-016 LeGORE v CITY OF BANDON
 
90-028 OREGONIANS IN ACTION v LCDC
 
90-032 DAWES v CITY OF MEDFORD
 
90-033 NEZ PERCE TRIBE v WALLOWA COUNTY
 
Back to the Top 

May
 
89-087 TORGESON v CITY OF CANBY
 
89-123 MURPHEY v CITY OF ASHLAND
 
89-154 ROWAN v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-156 SMITH v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-004 CLARK v JACKSON COUNTY
 
90-019 REEDER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-020 McKENZIE RIVER GUIDES ASSOC. v LANE COUNTY
 
90-023 PRIEST v MARION COUNTY
 
90-027 LACKEY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-045 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
 
90-046 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
 
90-063 CARMICHAEL v CITY OF EUGENE

June
 
89-092 TO 095 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS v CITY OF GRESHAM
 
89-108 NIEDERMEYER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-148 MANLEY v YAMHILL COUNTY
 
90-006 REED v LANE COUNTY
 
90-011 & 012 CITY OF WILSONVILLE v WASHINGTON COUNTY
 
90-015 REBMANN v LINN COUNTY
 
90-018 J.P. FINLEY & SON v WASHINGTON COUNTY
 
90-021 DLCD v CURRY COUNTY
 
90-022 DLCD v CURRY COUNTY
 
90-024 GOODMAN v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-034 PARMENTER v WALLOWA COUNTY
 
90-041 GRIFFITH v CITY OF MILWAUKIE
 
90-048 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS v CITY OF GRESHAM
 
90-057 CLUB WHOLESALE CONCEPTS, INC. v CITY OF SALEM
 
90-058 ODOT v CITY OF SALEM
 
90-078 DLCD v LINCOLN COUNTY

July
 
89-043 CENTURY 21 PROPERTIES, INC. v CITY OF TIGARD
 
89-058 COLUMBIA STEEL CASTINGS CO. v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
89-109 KENNEDY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
89-143 BLOOMER v BAKER COUNTY
 
89-149 LOWRIE v POLK COUNTY
 
89-153 & 159 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
 
90-009 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
 
90-025 CHAMBERS v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-035 BRIDGES v CITY OF SALEM
 
90-042 HARVARD MEDICAL PARK, LTD. v CITY OF ROSEBURG
 
90-044 FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER v CITY OF THE DALLES
 
90-055 McNULTY v MARION COUNTY

August
 
89-030 SENSIBLE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS v METRO
 
89-137 TO 140 McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOC. v WASHINGTON COUNTY
 
90-005 CITY OF PORTLAND v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
 
90-013 CECIL v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
 
90-031 VON LUBKEN v HOOD RIVER COUNTY
 
90-039 HENRY v SHERMAN COUNTY
 
90-047 EAST McANDREWS NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF MEDFORD
 
90-054 KEUDELL v UNION COUNTY
 
90-069 DLCD v KLAMATH COUNTY
 
90-079 LeGORE v CITY OF BANDON
 
90-084 CHAMBERS COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v CITY OF EUGENE
 
90-085 TCB CONSTRUCTION, INC. v CITY OF MONMOUTH

September
 
90-036 GILCHRIST v CITY OF PRINEVILLE
 
90-037 BURK v CITY OF UMATILLA
 
90-060 MEADOWBROOK DEVELOPMENT v CITY OF SEASIDE
 
90-066 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v BENTON COUNTY
 
90-067 HOFFMAN v CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
 
90-073 J AND D FERTILIZERS v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-075 INTERLACHEN, INC. v CITY OF FAIRVIEW
 
90-077 SABIN v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-088 THURSTON HILLS NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
 
90-092 COOLEY v CITY OF ALBANY
 
90-119 HOILAND v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
Back to the Top 

October
 
86-040 & 041 NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-030 & 038 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
 
90-056 BECK v CITY OF TILLAMOOK
 
90-064 KNAPP v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
 
90-068 NEUENSCHWANDER v CITY OF ASHLAND
 
90-071 AXON v CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
 
90-081 SHIRLEY v WASHINGTON COUNTY
 
90-083 PUTNAM v KLAMATH COUNTY
 
90-090 McCARTY v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-097 SCHRYVER v CITY OF HILLSBORO
 
90-110 McCAULEY v JACKSON COUNTY

November
 
84-059 DIONNE v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
 
89-062 NORTHWEST HOUSING v CITY OF GLADSTONE
 
90-017 & 040 SMITH v CITY OF CANYONVILLE
 
90-050 WISSUSIK v YAMHILL COUNTY
 
90-059 TORGESON v CITY OF CANBY
 
90-062 VON LUBKEN v HOOD RIVER COUNTY
 
90-065 BENJAMIN v CITY OF ASHLAND
 
90-080 WINTEROWD v CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
 
90-089 HEARNE v BAKER COUNTY
 
90-099 TYLKA v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-102 THORMAHLEN v CITY OF ASHLAND
 
90-103 SOUTHWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. v CITY OF PHILOMATH
 
90-107 REEDER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-112 KITTLESON v LANE COUNTY

December
 
90-049 STANDLEE v CITY OF TIGARD
 
90-051 HULING BROS. RENTAL & LEASING v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-070 FOREST PARK ESTATE v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
 
90-072 KOMNING v GRANT COUNTY
 
90-095 WADE v LANE COUNTY
 
90-098 STRAWN v CITY OF ALBANY
 
90-109 HERSHEY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
 
90-111 BARTELS v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-115 OREGON STATE POLICE v LANE COUNTY
 
90-117 HULING BROS. RENTAL & LEASING v CITY OF PORTLAND
 
90-118 WHEELER v MARION COUNTY
 
90-133 SCHATZ v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
 
Back to the Top