 |
| January |
|
88-082 KIRPAL LIGHT SATSANG v DOUGLAS COUNTY
88-130 SUNBURST II HOMEOWNERS v CITY OF WEST LINN
89-024 PERUZZO v WASCO COUNTY
89-067 REYNOLDS METALS CO. v CITY OF TROUTDALE
89-086 DOUGLAS v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
89-096 BECK v CITY OF TILLAMOOK
89-106 O'BRIEN v CITY OF WEST LINN
89-119 WEIST v JACKSON COUNTY
89-124 FLOWERS v KLAMATH COUNTY
89-136 OREGON ASPHALTIC PAVING CO. v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-145 PENDLETON RENTAL OWNERS v CITY OF PENDLETON
89-150 OAK LODGE WATER DISTRICT v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
|
| February |
|
83-083 McDONALD v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
88-110 DYKE v CLATSOP COUNTY
89-025 KIRPAL LIGHT SATSANG v DOUGLAS COUNTY
89-077 WALKER v CITY OF BEAVERTON
89-105 & 111 FOLAND v JACKSON COUNTY
89-110 GANNAWAY v UMATILLA COUNTY
89-118 STEFAN v YAMHILL COUNTY
89-131 GARRE v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-132 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v LANE COUNTY
89-133 DLCD v JOSEPHINE COUNTY
89-135 & 142 SPARACINO v KLAMATH COUNTY
89-141 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v COOS COUNTY
90-001 ELLIOTT v LANE COUNTY
90-003 LeROQUE v CITY OF GRESHAM
90-010 GLEANERS OF CLACKAMAS CO. v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
|
| March |
|
89-005 ECKIS v LINN COUNTY
89-018 CORBETT/TERWILLIGER NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF PORTLAND
89-134 ZORN v MARION COUNTY
89-146 ATKINS v DESCHUTES COUNTY
89-147 J.K. LAND CORPORATION v CITY OF GRESHAM
89-152 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
89-155 THENNES v DOUGLAS COUNTY
90-014 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v DOUGLAS COUNTY
90-043 ELLIOTT v CITY OF EUGENE
|
| April |
|
89-035 OREGON AAA v METRO
89-112 VESTIBULAR DISORDER CONSULT. v CITY OF PORTLAND
89-144 HEADLEY v JACKSON COUNTY
89-151 NELSON v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-158 SCHATZ v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
90-002 NICOLAI v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-007 DLCD v COLUMBIA COUNTY
90-008 BLOOMER v BAKER COUNTY
90-016 LeGORE v CITY OF BANDON
90-028 OREGONIANS IN ACTION v LCDC
90-032 DAWES v CITY OF MEDFORD
90-033 NEZ PERCE TRIBE v WALLOWA COUNTY
|
| May |
|
89-087 TORGESON v CITY OF CANBY
89-123 MURPHEY v CITY OF ASHLAND
89-154 ROWAN v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-156 SMITH v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-004 CLARK v JACKSON COUNTY
90-019 REEDER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-020 McKENZIE RIVER GUIDES ASSOC. v LANE COUNTY
90-023 PRIEST v MARION COUNTY
90-027 LACKEY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-045 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
90-046 REEVES v CITY OF TUALATIN
90-063 CARMICHAEL v CITY OF EUGENE
|
| June |
|
89-092 TO 095 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS v CITY OF GRESHAM
89-108 NIEDERMEYER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-148 MANLEY v YAMHILL COUNTY
90-006 REED v LANE COUNTY
90-011 & 012 CITY OF WILSONVILLE v WASHINGTON COUNTY
90-015 REBMANN v LINN COUNTY
90-018 J.P. FINLEY & SON v WASHINGTON COUNTY
90-021 DLCD v CURRY COUNTY
90-022 DLCD v CURRY COUNTY
90-024 GOODMAN v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-034 PARMENTER v WALLOWA COUNTY
90-041 GRIFFITH v CITY OF MILWAUKIE
90-048 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS v CITY OF GRESHAM
90-057 CLUB WHOLESALE CONCEPTS, INC. v CITY OF SALEM
90-058 ODOT v CITY OF SALEM
90-078 DLCD v LINCOLN COUNTY
|
| July |
|
89-043 CENTURY 21 PROPERTIES, INC. v CITY OF TIGARD
89-058 COLUMBIA STEEL CASTINGS CO. v CITY OF PORTLAND
89-109 KENNEDY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
89-143 BLOOMER v BAKER COUNTY
89-149 LOWRIE v POLK COUNTY
89-153 & 159 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
90-009 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
90-025 CHAMBERS v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-035 BRIDGES v CITY OF SALEM
90-042 HARVARD MEDICAL PARK, LTD. v CITY OF ROSEBURG
90-044 FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER v CITY OF THE DALLES
90-055 McNULTY v MARION COUNTY
|
| August |
|
89-030 SENSIBLE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS v METRO
89-137 TO 140 McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOC. v WASHINGTON COUNTY
90-005 CITY OF PORTLAND v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
90-013 CECIL v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
90-031 VON LUBKEN v HOOD RIVER COUNTY
90-039 HENRY v SHERMAN COUNTY
90-047 EAST McANDREWS NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF MEDFORD
90-054 KEUDELL v UNION COUNTY
90-069 DLCD v KLAMATH COUNTY
90-079 LeGORE v CITY OF BANDON
90-084 CHAMBERS COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v CITY OF EUGENE
90-085 TCB CONSTRUCTION, INC. v CITY OF MONMOUTH
|
| September |
|
90-036 GILCHRIST v CITY OF PRINEVILLE
90-037 BURK v CITY OF UMATILLA
90-060 MEADOWBROOK DEVELOPMENT v CITY OF SEASIDE
90-066 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v BENTON COUNTY
90-067 HOFFMAN v CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
90-073 J AND D FERTILIZERS v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-075 INTERLACHEN, INC. v CITY OF FAIRVIEW
90-077 SABIN v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-088 THURSTON HILLS NEIGH. ASSOC. v CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
90-092 COOLEY v CITY OF ALBANY
90-119 HOILAND v CITY OF PORTLAND
|
| October |
|
86-040 & 041 NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-030 & 038 DAVIS v CITY OF BANDON
90-056 BECK v CITY OF TILLAMOOK
90-064 KNAPP v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
90-068 NEUENSCHWANDER v CITY OF ASHLAND
90-071 AXON v CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
90-081 SHIRLEY v WASHINGTON COUNTY
90-083 PUTNAM v KLAMATH COUNTY
90-090 McCARTY v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-097 SCHRYVER v CITY OF HILLSBORO
90-110 McCAULEY v JACKSON COUNTY
|
| November |
|
84-059 DIONNE v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
89-062 NORTHWEST HOUSING v CITY OF GLADSTONE
90-017 & 040 SMITH v CITY OF CANYONVILLE
90-050 WISSUSIK v YAMHILL COUNTY
90-059 TORGESON v CITY OF CANBY
90-062 VON LUBKEN v HOOD RIVER COUNTY
90-065 BENJAMIN v CITY OF ASHLAND
90-080 WINTEROWD v CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
90-089 HEARNE v BAKER COUNTY
90-099 TYLKA v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-102 THORMAHLEN v CITY OF ASHLAND
90-103 SOUTHWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. v CITY OF PHILOMATH
90-107 REEDER v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-112 KITTLESON v LANE COUNTY
|
| December |
|
90-049 STANDLEE v CITY OF TIGARD
90-051 HULING BROS. RENTAL & LEASING v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-070 FOREST PARK ESTATE v MULTNOMAH COUNTY
90-072 KOMNING v GRANT COUNTY
90-095 WADE v LANE COUNTY
90-098 STRAWN v CITY OF ALBANY
90-109 HERSHEY v CLACKAMAS COUNTY
90-111 BARTELS v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-115 OREGON STATE POLICE v LANE COUNTY
90-117 HULING BROS. RENTAL & LEASING v CITY OF PORTLAND
90-118 WHEELER v MARION COUNTY
90-133 SCHATZ v CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
|
|