Skip to main content

Oregon State Flag An official website of the State of Oregon »

Rulemaking

Current Notices:

 Attached is the temporary rule filing that amends OAR 462-150-0010 (5)(a) regarding official workouts for Thoroughbreds. - EFFECTIVE UPON FILING 8/22/2025 and to remain in effect through 2/17/2026.

The temporary amendment has been filed due to discontinued racing at Northern California tracks where required official workouts ordinarily could be completed after the Tillamook and prior to the Grants Pass, OR race meets. Recognizing the hardship, the ORC approved the amended number of days so that all Thoroughbreds that need official published workouts can complete them within the eligibility timeframe.

The temporary rule will extend the time from 30 to 45 days, making it possible for horses that need official published workouts to complete them.

Filing receipt Temp rule 462-150-0010 (5)(a) Works.pdf

ORC bullet small 3.png 

Attached are proposed rule amendments for your review and comment. The comment period is now open and will remain open until 8:00 a.m. January 10, 2026. Written comment maybe sent by email to  Karen.parkman@orc.oregon.gov or sent by US postal service to the Oregon Racing Commission – PO Box 366, Gresham OR 97030.  See below for scheduled hearings.

ORC bullet small 3.png

A hearing has been scheduled for all the attached proposed rule amendments (Remote Via TEAMS):

OAR 462-220-0030

Date: 12/18/2025

Time: 9:00-9:30 a.m.

462-220-0030 (3)(f) regarding affiliates.html

OAR 462-220-0040

Date: 12/18/2025

Time: 9:30-10:00 a.m.

462-220-0040 Net vs gross.html 

OAR 462-220-0050

Date: 12/18/2025

Time: 10:00-10:30 a.m.

462-220-0050 non-merged pool.html

Join Meetings here


Attached are proposed rule amendments for your review and comment. The comment period is now open and will remain open until 11:55 p.m. January 22, 2026. Written comment may be sent by email to  Karen.parkman@orc.oregon.gov or sent by US postal service to the Oregon Racing Commission – PO Box 366, Gresham OR 97030.  See below for scheduled hearings.

 

A hearing has been scheduled for the attached proposed rule amendments (Remote Via TEAMS):

462-140-0320 (6)(i) EIA testing requirements.pdf

Date: 1/21/2026

Time: 9:00-9:30 a.m.

 

462-140-0130 (28)(h) regarding emergency warning system.pdf

Date: 1/21/2026

Time: 9:30-10:00 a.m.

 

Microsoft Teams Need help?

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 266 160 637 971 35

Passcode: qr7zF3gF

 

Dial in by phone

+1 503-446-4951,,712285630# United States, Portland

Find a local number

Phone conference ID: 712 285 630#

For organizers: Meeting options | Reset dial-in PIN


The following public comment was received from Commissioner Stein, DVM via email regarding OAR 462-140-0320 (6) (i)"I oppose any change to the 6 month Coggins requirement for Oregon. First, our rules should be to protect Oregon racing. In no way does a 6 month requirement negatively affect Oregon horsemen. If they choose to race in states that require a 1 year Coggins, their test is still valid for those jurisdictions. 

Second, other racetracks have secure stable gates with security checking in and out the horses. Our fairs do not. One of the main purposes as it relates to Coggins tests is for contact tracing should a positive case arise. Unfortunately, many of the Quarter Horses that come to Oregon come from racetracks with questionable security. Bush track racing is a problem with Quarter Horses and a 6 month Coggins is added security for the Oregon racing program.

Third, Canada has a 6 month requirement for Coggins. Arapahoe Park in Colorado has a 30 day requirement (tests must be performed within 30 days of entry to stable area) for Quarter Horses.

Lastly, it is foolish to believe that we won't have expired Coggins tests during our meets going back to 1 year tests. Expiration of tests occurs at every track even when 1 year tests are done. If Coggins tests are done after a horse has arrived to Oregon tracks, the risk to the entire population is devastating should that horse test positive.

In short, the risks in changing this requirement far outweigh any benefits, benefits that are nebulous at best."

Additional public comment: RD-Letter to ORC coggins test -2025 (003).html