| Road User Fee Task Force |
|
|
 |
| Reports |
|
Public Involvement & Road User Charge Development: Oregon's Experience
2005 Report to the Legislative Assembly
Appendices
- A: Oregon Road User Fee Task Force Background and Membership List
- B: Oregon Demographic, Income, and Road Use Data
- C: Long-Range Projections of Market Penetration for Light Duty Hybrid Electric and Diesel Vehicles and Impact on Oregon's Highway Fund Reserve
- D: Sub-task 1.1 – P240S Stakeholder Needs, prepared by Professors David S. Kim and J. David Porter, Oregon State University, College of Engineering
- E: Projected Shift to Mileage Fee Payments at Retail
- F: Technology Development and System Integration for a Vehicle Miles Traveled Based Revenue Collection System Prototype, prepared by Professors David S. Kim and J. David Porter, Oregon State University, College of Engineering
- G: Focus Group Reports
- H: VMT Administrative Processes
2003 Report to Legislative Assembly
Appendices
- A Enrolled House Bill 3946
- B Road User Fee Task Force Membership Listing 2001-2002
- C VMT and Fuel Efficiency Data
- D State Highway Mileage Summary
- E Highway Fund Revenue Forecast Assumptions
- F List of Reports and Presentations to Road User Fee Task Force
- G Summary of Public Comment
- H Presentations by the Road User Fee Task Force
- I Revenue Neutral VMT Fee: Revenue from Selected Rural Highway Segments
- J Comparison of Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled in Non-Interstate Oregon Counties
- K County Characteristics and VMT
- L Potential Revenue Sources Considered
- M Six Mileage Fee Scenarios
- N Mileage-Based Fee Scenarios—Advantages and Disadvantages
- O Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario One
- P Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario Two
- Q Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario Three
- R Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario Four
- S Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario Five
- T Mileage-Based Fee—Options for Scenario Six
- U Economic Analysis of the Affordability of Retrofitting Odometer Tag Technology During Phasing In of Mileage Fee
- V Motor Vehicle Registrations by Year of Manufacture
- W VMT Fee Implementation: Potential Methods and Capital Cost Implications
- X VMT Fee Implementation: Potential Methods and Operating Cost Implications
- Y Cost of Auditing VMT Fee Collected at the Fuel Pump
- Z Estimated Annual Administrative Cost for Central Collection of VMT Fee
- AA Taxing Gasoline at the Pump
- BB RUFTF VMT Overlays
- CC Comparison of Fuel Tax and VMT Fee Payments
- DD Options for Congestion Pricing
- EE RUFTF Pilot Test Program Recommendation 2003-2006
- FF Pilot Test Program Evaluation Criteria
- GG Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for November 30, 2001
- HH Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2002
- II Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for March 8, 2002
- JJ Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for April 12, 2002
- KK Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for May 3, 2002
- LL Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for July 12, 2002
- MM Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for September 6, 2002
- NN Road User Fee Task Force Meeting Minutes for November 15, 2002
Research Reports of the Road User Fee Task Force
- Technology Development for VMT — OSU Final Report, May 2004 (all documents are pdf)
- Technology Evaluation for Implementation of Vehicle Miles Traveled Based Revenue Collection Systems — Final Report, Oregon State University Professors David Kim, David Porter, Robin Wurl (pdf)
- Institutional Options for VMT Data and Fee Collection Centers — Final Report, Portland State University Professor Anthony Rufolo (pdf)
- Data Transmission Options for VMT Data and Fee Collection Centers — Final Report, Portland State University Professor Robert Bertini (pdf)
- Alternatives to the Motor Fuels Tax, by Anthony Rufolo, Robert Bertini and Thomas Kimpel - Portland State University (pdf)
|
|
|
|
