Performance Standards
Please note: Only cities and counties in metropolitan areas and Metro are required to follow this performance standards/targets setting process.
For cities and counties in metropolitan areas and Metro, OAR 660-012-0215 establishes requirements for transportation performance standards that cities and counties use to review comprehensive plan and land use regulation amendments provided in OAR 660-012-0060. If a city or county requires applicants to analyze transportation impacts as part of a development review in acknowledged local land use regulations, then that review
shall include evaluation of the performance standards established in OAR 660-012-0215. This also applies to transportation performance standards that Metro uses to review functional plan amendments as provided in OAR 660-012-0060.
OAR 660-012-0215 outlines the performance standard requirements for cities, counties, ODOT, and Metro. Cities, counties, ODOT, and Metro
shall adopt two or more transportation performance standards. At least one of the transportation performance standards
shall support increasing transportation options and avoiding principal reliance on automobiles. The TSP
shall clearly establish how to apply the multiple performance standards to a proposal that meets some, but not necessarily all, of the transportation performance standards. The transportation performance standards
shall evaluate at least two of the following objectives for the transportation system, for any or all modes of transportation:
- Reducing climate pollution
- Equity
- Safety
- Network connectivity
- Accessibility
- Efficiency
- Reliability
- Mobility
Cities, counties, ODOT, and Metro
shall establish the transportation performance standards to include these elements:
- Characteristics of the transportation system that will be measured, estimated, or projected, and the methods to calculate their performance.
- Thresholds to determine whether the measured, estimated, or projected performance meets the performance standard. Thresholds may vary by facility type, location, or other factors. Thresholds shall be set at the end of the planning period, time of development, or another time.
- Findings for how the performance standard supports meeting the targets for performance measures set as provided in OAR 660-012-0910 (see
Performance Measures for Reporting for more information).
Resources
The table below illustrates which of the performance measures included in OAR 660-012-0905 have the most direct relationship to achieving the objectives shown in OAR 660-012-0215. Many of these measures have additional indirect relationships to the objectives; therefore, each jurisdiction shall document how the measures they have selected to utilize as transportation standards address at least two of the required objectives. It is worth noting that these performance measures can be supplemented with additional measures selected by a local jurisdiction.
Performance Measures from OAR 660-012-0905 | Objectives from OAR 660-012-0215 | | | | | | |
|
| Reducing Climate Pollution | Equity | Safety | Network Connectivity | Accessibility | Efficiency | Reliability | Mobility |
Number of publicly supported affordable housing units in climate-friendly areas | X | X | | | | X | | |
Number of existing and permitted dwelling units in climate-friendly areas and percentage of existing and permitted dwelling units in climate-friendly areas relative to the total number of existing and permitted dwelling units in the jurisdiction | X | X | | | | X | | |
Share of retail and service jobs in climate-friendly areas relative to retail and service jobs in the jurisdiction | X | | | | | X | | |
Percent of collector and arterials streets in climate-friendly areas and underserved population neighborhoods with bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are rated with a Level of Traffic Stress 1 or 2 | X | | X | X | X | | | |
Percent of collector and arterial roadways in climate-friendly areas and underserved population neighborhoods with safe and convenient marked pedestrian crossings | X | | X | X | X | | | |
Number of employees covered by an Employee Commute Options Program | X | | | | x | | | |
Number of households engaged with Transportation Options activities | X | | | | | | | |
Percent of all Transportation Options activities that were focused on underserved population communities | X | X | | | | | | |
Share of households within a half-mile of a priority transit corridor | X | | | | X | | | |
Share of low-income households within a half-mile of a priority transit corridor | X | X | | | x | | | |
Share of key destinations within a half-mile of a priority transit corridor | X | | | | X | | | |
Average daily public parking fees in climate-friendly areas | X | | | | | | | |
Household-based vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita | X | | | | | X | |
|