Please note this FAQ section will be updated regularly as more questions are asked.
- General
- Application and award
- Use of funds and limitations
- Program eligibility
- Program design
General
What are considered administrative costs? Is there a cap?
According to Section 71401 of Public Law 119-21 (H.R.1), no more than 10% of the amount allotted to a State for a budget period may be used for administrative expenses, including indirect and direct costs. This cap is cumulative and applies to the administrative costs across the entire budget, including administrative costs incurred by both the awardee and any subrecipient.
Generally, administrative costs are defined as general administration and general expenses such as director's office, accounting, administrative personnel, and other types of expenditures classified as administrative.
Indirect costs are those shared across multiple projects and not easily separated. Expenses included in the indirect cost pool must not be charged as direct costs. Only indirect administrative expenses count toward the 10% cap.
What programmatic and personnel costs fall under the 10% administrative cap?
It depends on the nature of the activities performed, not the employment structure.
Examples of costs that fall under the cap:
- Audits and audit-like programs directly associated with oversight of this program and associated funding.
- Outside evaluator collecting data and evaluating the program for the lead agency.
- Generally, if the staff person or contractor is supporting the administration of the program, they would be considered an administrative cost.
Examples of costs that would not fall under the cap:
- Audits and audit-like programs directly associated with oversight of this program & associated funding.
- Outside evaluator hired to directly carry out program activities, such as conducting a needs assessment for rural areas that is a core component in one of a state's initiatives.
- Hiring preceptors and purchasing equipment to facilitate training residents.
Generally, if the staff person or contractor is directly related to implementing / executing / delivering activities described within specific initiatives, they would not be considered an administrative cost even if they are employed by the state.
Application and award
When was Oregon's application to CMS submitted?
- Oregon met the CMS deadline of November 5, 2025, by submitting its application on November 4, 2025.
Is Oregon's application to CMS public?
- The most up-to-date information is available on OHA's RHT Program
webpage, including a project summary, a project narrative, a budget narrative, a letter to OHA partners and a letter of support from Gov. Tina Kotek for the state's application.
When will the state know if they are awarded funding?
- CMS is required by law to issue awards by December 31, 2025. Before then, states will undergo budget negotiations and may be asked to rescale initiatives and eliminate certain use of funds that are deemed unallowable or exceed spending limits set in the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
How much funding is Oregon expecting to receive?
- Although OHA submitted the application budget for $200,000,000 per CMS's requirements, it is unclear whether and how much CMS will award to Oregon the first budget year. Awards will be made to each approved state based on numerous criteria that can be viewed in the
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
Use of funds and limitations
Can funding be used toward existing programs or initiatives?
- There can be no supplantation or duplication. States can use funds to expand an existing pilot program or initiative, or to develop new training programs with existing partners. Funds may only be applied to costs associated with the new population, new activities, new program milestones, etc.
Please see OHA Allowable Use of Funds for more information, including specific restrictions for each Use of Funds category.
Program eligibility
Is funding limited to certain providers or entities?
Per the NOFO and CMS FAQs:
- Each state has the discretion to determine whether and to whom to subaward or contract funds.
- There are no limits on the types of entities that may receive funds through the program.
Oregon intends to direct funds to hospitals, health clinics, community health centers, and community-based organizations providing health care services in rural and frontier areas statewide. The state will apply the
Oregon Office of Rural Health (ORH) definition of rural and frontier to determine eligibility: rural is any geographic areas in Oregon ten or more miles from the center of a population center of 40,000 people or more. Frontier (or “remote") is any county with six or fewer people per square mile. Frontier areas are considered a subset of rural and are included whenever rural populations are referenced.
Program design
How does Oregon define of rural?
- Rural is any geographic areas in Oregon ten or more miles from the center of a population center of 40,000 people or more. Frontier (or “remote") is any county with six or fewer people per square mile. Frontier areas are considered a subset of rural and are included whenever rural populations are referenced.
What are the reporting requirements?
- As required, OHA submitted a list of outcomes and associated metrics for each initiative in
the project narrative of its application. States will report quarterly and annually on progress on their work plans, timelines, milestones, and achievement of measurable outcomes. CMS will use these reports to evaluate compliance with cooperative agreement terms and a state's progress on its initiatives and policy commitments.
Subgrantees and subcontractors will be required to track and report on all required metrics in a timely manner that aligns with federal reporting requirements.