Please note this FAQ section will be updated regularly as more questions are asked.
- General
- Application and award
- Use of funds and limitations
- Program eligibility
- Program design
General
What are considered administrative costs? Is there a cap?
According to Section 71401 of Public Law 119-21 (H.R.1), no more than 10% of the amount allotted to a State for a budget period may be used for administrative expenses, including indirect administrative costs. This cap is cumulative and applies to the administrative costs across the entire budget, including administrative costs incurred by both the awardee and any subrecipient.
Generally, administrative costs are defined as general administration and general expenses such as director's office, accounting, administrative personnel, and other types of expenditures classified as administrative.
Indirect costs are those shared acros[s multiple projects and not easily separated. Expenses included in the indirect cost pool must not be charged as direct costs.
What programmatic and personnel costs fall under the 10% administrative cap?
It depends on the nature of the activities performed, not the employment structure.
CMS has communicated that it will depend upon the type of work that is being done as reflected in the State's budget justification, and it will assess on a case-by-case basis.
Examples of costs that fall under the cap:
- Audits and audit-like programs directly associated with oversight of this program and associated funding.
- Outside evaluator collecting data and evaluating the program for the lead agency.
- An accountant hired to keep track of RHT Program funds.
Examples of costs that would not fall under the cap:
- Outside evaluator hired to directly carry out program activities, such as conducting a needs assessment for rural areas that is a core component in one of a state's initiatives.
- Hiring preceptors and purchasing equipment to facilitate training residents.
Generally, if the staff person or contractor is directly related to implementing / executing / delivering activities described within specific initiatives, they would not be considered an administrative cost even if they are employed by the state.
Application and award
When was Oregon's application to CMS submitted?
- Oregon met the CMS deadline of November 5, 2025, by submitting its application on November 4, 2025.
Is Oregon's application to CMS public?
- The most up-to-date information is available on OHA's RHT Program
webpage, including a project summary, a project narrative, a budget narrative, a letter to OHA partners and a letter of support from Gov. Tina Kotek for the state's application.
When will the state know if they are awarded funding?
- CMS is required by law to issue awards by December 31, 2025. Before then, states will undergo budget negotiations and may be asked to rescale initiatives and eliminate certain use of funds that are deemed unallowable or exceed spending limits set in the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
How much funding is Oregon expecting to receive?
- Although OHA submitted the application budget for $200,000,000 per CMS's requirements, it is unclear whether and how much CMS will award to Oregon the first budget year. Awards will be made to each approved state based on numerous criteria that can be viewed in the
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
As of December 22, 2025, CMS has yet to issue award decisions, so the State's application and budget could be funded in part, in full, or not at all.
Use of funds and limitations
What does "right sizing care availability" mean?
- Right-sizing care availability means aligning the services offered within a community with that community's needs. We do this by considering a community's unique needs – in size, scale, and specialty. Right-sizing availability supports effective and sustainable care.
Can urban organizations receive funding to run workforce programs, such as residency programs that have rural rotations?
- Yes. An urban organization can receive funding to run a workforce program as long as the funded activities impact rural communities. For example, funding for residency programs should support rural track programs (RTPs). RTPs give urban programs the opportunity to partner with rural hospitals, rural ambulatory clinics, and other non-hospital sites to expand Graduate Medical Education training.
Can funding be used toward existing programs or initiatives?
- There can be no supplantation or duplication. States can use funds to expand an existing pilot program or initiative, or to develop new training programs with existing partners. Funds may only be applied to costs associated with the new population, new activities, new program milestones, etc.
Please see OHA Allowable Use of Funds for more information, including specific restrictions for each Use of Funds category.
Program eligibility
Is funding limited to certain providers or entities?Per the NOFO and CMS FAQs:
- Each state has the discretion to determine whether and to whom to subaward or contract funds.
- There are no limits on the types of entities that may receive funds through the program.
Oregon intends to direct funds to hospitals, health clinics, community health centers, and community-based organizations providing health care services in rural and frontier areas statewide. The state will apply the
Oregon Office of Rural Health (ORH) definition of rural and frontier to determine eligibility: rural is any geographic areas in Oregon ten or more miles from the center of a population center of 40,000 people or more. Frontier (or “remote") is any county with six or fewer people per square mile. Frontier areas are considered a subset of rural and are included whenever rural populations are referenced.
Program design
How does Oregon define rural?
- Rural is any geographic areas in Oregon ten or more miles from the center of a population center of 40,000 people or more. Frontier (or “remote") is any county with six or fewer people per square mile. Frontier areas are considered a subset of rural and are included whenever rural populations are referenced.
What are the different distribution pathways?
For Phase 1 (FY26-27) of the program, Oregon proposed in its application to distribute funds through three pathways:
- Catalyst Awards: Through a Request for Grant Application (RFGA) process, applicants must apply across the three initiatives (Healthy Communities & Prevention, Workforce Capacity & Resilience, Technology & Data Modernization) for ready-to-go projects that can launch immediately or within a couple months of receiving funding and be implemented within the first two years of the Rural Health Transformation Program.
- Immediate Impact Awards: Direct awards for a select set of aligned opportunities identified by the state. There will not be an application for these awards.
- Regional Sustainability Awards: Procure a subcontractor(s) to provide facilitation and technical assistance to organizations developing rural health networks and regional solutions. These convenings will prepare interested entities for Phase 2 of this distribution pathway, which will include funding opportunities for applications with regional solutions for stabilizing rural health care systems.
Note: Phase 2 of the program includes additional funding opportunities via Sustained and Competitive Catalyst Awards with emphasis on collaboration across organizations.
Additional details can be found in the application budget narrative.
How do we know if our organization is eligible to apply for the Catalyst Awards?
In our application, Oregon listed a broad range of potential partners, as there are many types of organizations that provide health care and social health services to rural communities. While we await CMS award decisions, OHA is planning the Catalyst Awards and refining the eligibility criteria to reflect public feedback, areas of greatest need, and ensure maximum impact of federal funds.
Generally, applicants will be expected to apply to achieve outcomes within at least one of three possible initiatives:
- Healthy Communities & Prevention
- Workforce Capacity & Resilience
- Technology & Data Modernization
And must serve at least one population of focus:
- Maternal and child health;
- Co-occurring BH conditions;
- Individuals aging in place; and/or
- Chronic disease.
Where does telehealth activities rank on the list of priorities?
As of December 2025, OHA has not yet ranked eligible activities. OHA strategically identified all activities proposed under the four state-led initiatives, based on their role in providing critical support to the aims of each initiative.
Will the Immediate Impact Awards be awarded competitively?
No. There will not be an application for these awards. OHA is exploring potential projects for Immediate Impact Awards. We will prioritize projects that directly meet the one-year metrics proposed in our RHTP application because CMS has tied future funding to meeting the previous year's metrics.
What are the reporting requirements?
- As required, OHA submitted a list of outcomes and associated metrics for each initiative in
the project narrative of its application. States will report quarterly and annually on progress on their work plans, timelines, milestones, and achievement of measurable outcomes. CMS will use these reports to evaluate compliance with cooperative agreement terms and a state's progress on its initiatives and policy commitments.
Subgrantees and subcontractors will be required to track and report on all required metrics in a timely manner that aligns with federal reporting requirements.